The concepts of natura naturata and natura naturans are fundamental to understanding various philosophical and metaphysical perspectives, particularly within the realms of natural philosophy, theology, and metaphysics. These terms, which originate from the Latin language, were popularized in the context of early modern European thought, particularly in the works of philosophers like Baruch Spinoza and in the broader context of natural philosophy. This article explores these two concepts, their historical development, and their implications for understanding nature and existence.
Natura naturata is a Latin phrase that translates to “nature as created” or “nature being created.” It refers to the passive, static aspect of nature, emphasizing the state of nature as a finished product or the result of a process. In other words, natura naturata represents nature as it exists, with all its forms, structures, and phenomena.
• Historical Context: The term was notably used by Baruch Spinoza in his work, Ethics. Spinoza differentiated between natura naturans (nature as a creative force) and natura naturata (nature as the created reality). For Spinoza, natura naturata included everything that exists as a result of nature’s active principle, the tangible and perceptible universe.
• Philosophical Implications: Natura naturata is often discussed in the context of understanding the natural world as a system of relationships and entities that have already been shaped by the underlying forces of nature. It includes everything that exists, from physical objects to living organisms, and encompasses all phenomena that are the outcome of natural processes.
Natura naturans translates to “nature as creator” or “nature in the act of creating.” This concept refers to the active, dynamic aspect of nature, focusing on the ongoing process of creation and the creative force behind natural phenomena. Natura naturans represents nature as a continuous, self-sustaining process, perpetually generating and transforming.
• Historical Context: Baruch Spinoza’s philosophy provides a clear exposition of natura naturans. In his view, natura naturans is synonymous with the divine or the infinite substance that produces and sustains all that exists. For Spinoza, nature’s creative power is the fundamental cause of everything that happens within the universe.
• Philosophical Implications: Natura naturans highlights the creative and generative aspects of nature, focusing on the dynamic processes that shape the natural world. It is concerned with the active principles or forces that drive change, development, and the evolution of the universe. This concept aligns with various philosophical and theological perspectives that emphasize nature’s inherent creativity and the continuous unfolding of existence.
The distinction between natura naturata and natura naturans provides a nuanced understanding of nature and existence:
• Natura Naturata: Emphasizes the results and products of nature’s processes. It is the static, observable aspect of nature that includes all physical entities and their interactions. It can be seen as the “finished” aspect of nature, encompassing everything that has been created.
• Natura Naturans: Focuses on the dynamic, active processes that generate and sustain nature. It represents the ongoing creativity and power of nature, driving the continuous evolution and transformation of the universe. It can be seen as the “creative” aspect of nature, responsible for the existence and development of all things.
In theological and metaphysical contexts, the concepts of natura naturata and natura naturans have been interpreted in various ways:
• Spinoza’s Pantheism: For Spinoza, natura naturans is synonymous with God or the divine substance, while natura naturata represents the manifestation of this divine substance in the physical world. Spinoza’s pantheistic view sees God as immanent in nature, with the divine being identical to the natural world.
• Christian Theology: In Christian thought, natura naturans can be associated with the divine creative power of God, while natura naturata represents the created world. This distinction helps to reconcile the belief in a transcendent God with the understanding of the natural world as a product of divine creation.
• Modern Perspectives: Contemporary philosophical and scientific perspectives often reinterpret these concepts in light of new discoveries and theories. For example, the understanding of nature’s creative processes may align with theories in cosmology and evolutionary biology that emphasize the dynamic and evolving nature of the universe.
The concepts of natura naturata and natura naturans also have implications for the study of science and nature:
• Scientific Exploration: Natura naturata is closely related to empirical science, which focuses on observing and understanding the results of natural processes. Scientists study the physical and biological aspects of nature as products of underlying processes.
• Theoretical Science: Natura naturans is relevant to theoretical science and philosophy, which seek to understand the fundamental principles and forces that drive natural processes. Theoretical models and hypotheses often aim to explain the dynamic mechanisms behind observed phenomena.
• Integration of Perspectives: Integrating the concepts of natura naturata and natura naturans allows for a more comprehensive understanding of nature. By recognizing both the static products and the dynamic processes of nature, scientists and philosophers can develop a richer and more holistic view of the natural world.
The concepts of natura naturata and natura naturans provide valuable insights into the nature of existence and the processes that shape the universe. Natura naturata represents the finished, observable aspects of nature, while natura naturans emphasizes the active, creative forces behind natural phenomena. By exploring these concepts, we gain a deeper understanding of both the static and dynamic dimensions of nature, enriching our philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives on the world.
These ideas continue to inspire discussions in various fields, encouraging a comprehensive exploration of the natural world and the fundamental principles that govern it.
1. Spinoza, Baruch. Ethics. Translated by Edwin Curley. Hackett Publishing, 1994.
2. McLaughlin, Peter. Spinoza’s Modernity: Mendelssohn, Lessing, and Heine. University of Chicago Press, 2010.
3. Deleuze, Gilles. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. City Lights Publishers, 1988.
4. Damasio, Antonio. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt, 1999.
5. Einstein, Albert. Relativity: The Special and General Theory. Translated by Robert W. Lawson. Henry Holt, 1920.